Ask a pilot to recite their recall items in a briefing room and most will do it accurately. Ask them in the simulator, thirty seconds after a rapid decompression with the first officer calling out warnings, and the picture changes. The items are the same. The pilot is the same. What has changed is the state they are performing in — the neurological and physiological environment that a genuine non-normal event creates, and that no amount of routine recall practice fully replicates.
This is the central challenge of this behaviour. Recall items are associated, by their very nature, with the most significant non-normal situations in the operation. They exist because those situations require immediate action, before there is time to consult a checklist, and because the consequences of delay or error are severe. The reliability of modern aircraft means that for most pilots, genuine recall events are separated by years of line flying. The simulator provides the structured opportunity to practise. But the gap between simulator recency and real-world performance under genuine startle remains real, and it requires deliberate attention.
Why Pressure Changes Everything
Retrieval from memory is not a fixed process. It is sensitive to the state of the person performing it. Under stress, under time pressure, under the cognitive load of managing a rapidly developing situation, the retrieval pathways that felt fluent in calm conditions become less reliable. Items that were easily accessible become harder to sequence correctly. The physical actions that accompany the recall — the choreography of the response — become more difficult to execute with the precision they require.
This is not a failure of knowledge. It is a predictable consequence of the conditions under which recall items must be performed. The pilot who knows their items thoroughly in the abstract is not necessarily the pilot who can perform them reliably in the moment. Bridging that gap requires a specific kind of preparation — one that goes beyond periodically reviewing the items and extends into rehearsing the performance itself.
The item that was fluent at the briefing is not guaranteed to be fluent under startle, with warnings active and the situation developing faster than expected.
The Briefing as Rehearsal
The pre-flight briefing is an underused rehearsal opportunity. Most pilots use it to confirm their recall items are current — a review, not a rehearsal. The distinction matters. A review confirms that the items are known. A rehearsal tests whether they can be performed: in sequence, with the correct callouts, with the physical actions that accompany them, under conditions that approximate the cognitive state in which they will actually be required.
Running a memory item during the briefing is not the same as running it in the simulator. But it is closer than reading it from a card the night before. Verbalising the item, going through the sequence out loud, physically tracing the actions on the relevant controls — these are the forms of rehearsal that begin to consolidate the performance rather than merely the knowledge. The briefing that includes this is doing something the briefing that only reviews items does not: it is narrowing the gap between knowing and performing.
There is a second function of the briefing rehearsal that is less obvious. Running memory items together, with the other crew member, rehearses not just the items themselves but the choreography of the crew response. Who calls what. Who does what. The sequence of actions between the two pilots. In a real event, that choreography must run smoothly under conditions where neither pilot has spare capacity to coordinate it actively. The briefing is the moment when the choreography can be agreed and rehearsed while both pilots have full cognitive resource available.
A recall item is not just a list of actions — it is a sequence of coordinated actions between two crew members. The pilot flying continues to fly the aircraft. The pilot monitoring initiates the memory items. Callouts are exchanged. Responses are confirmed. The sequence must interlock correctly between the two pilots, under conditions where both are managing elevated workload and neither is able to pause the situation while they coordinate.
The crew that has rehearsed the choreography has a shared picture of how the response should look. The crew that has only reviewed the individual items must construct the coordination in real time, under pressure, which is the most cognitively expensive version of a task that is already demanding enough.
Repetition and Resilience
The goal of recall item preparation is not fluency in calm conditions. It is resilience — the ability to perform reliably when the conditions are not calm. Resilience of this kind is built through repetition in conditions as close to real as achievable outside the simulator. Not perfect replication of the real event — that is not possible outside a simulator. But the closest approximation available in normal line operations.
Sitting in the seat, in the aircraft environment, verbalising and physically rehearsing the items as part of the pre-departure routine builds a form of embodied memory that is more robust under pressure than the abstract knowledge of the item sequence. The physical context matters. The seat, the controls, the panel — these are the environmental cues that will be present in the real event, and rehearsing in their presence strengthens the retrieval pathways that will be called on when they matter.
The frequency of rehearsal matters too. The recurrent simulator check provides a high-fidelity rehearsal environment at regular intervals. But the periods between those checks are long, and the reliability of modern aircraft means that real recall events do not fill the gap. The pilot who treats every pre-flight briefing as a low-intensity rehearsal opportunity is building a higher frequency of recall consolidation than the pilot who reserves it for simulator preparation.
Surprising Yourself
There is a more demanding rehearsal method that is available to crews willing to use it: the unexpected challenge. One crew member asks the other, without prior notice, to perform a recall item. The artificial nature of the exercise does not diminish its value. The small element of surprise introduces a mild version of the cognitive state that a real event produces — the shift from routine operation to a different kind of demand. Everything that moves performance in that direction is useful.
This method requires a specific framework to function within Leadership and Teamwork boundaries. The challenge only works when it has been agreed in advance. Both crew members must have consented to the process, understood what it will involve, and agreed the boundaries within which it will operate. An ambush without prior agreement is not development. It is a disruption to the crew dynamic that is likely to produce defensiveness rather than learning, and that may compromise the trust that effective crew performance depends on.
Agreed in advance, the unexpected challenge is a genuinely useful tool. The crew member who has consented to being challenged at an unspecified moment during the duty day is in a different state of readiness than one who is simply reviewing items on a card. That state of readiness is itself a form of rehearsal — the low-level alertness that keeps recall items closer to the surface of conscious access throughout the flight.
Resilience as the Target
The question this behaviour ultimately asks is not whether the recall items are known. It is whether the crew member is resilient enough to perform them in the moment. Not recall in the abstract — recall under startle, under workload, in the sequence the situation requires, with the choreography that the two-crew environment demands.
Resilience of this kind is not given by knowledge alone. It is built through repeated performance under progressively more demanding conditions. The simulator provides the most demanding version of those conditions. The briefing provides a lower-fidelity but higher-frequency version. The unexpected challenge provides an intermediate version that is underused in line operations. Each of these is a contribution to the same goal: narrowing the gap between knowing and performing, until the performance in the moment is as reliable as the knowledge in the briefing room.
Training Events
High Performance Pilot structures your development of Recalls Critical Memory Items across three levels — Foundation, Proficient, and Mastery. The simulator provides the high-fidelity rehearsal. HPP builds the habit that keeps recall reliable between those events. Free to start.
Start Free — highperformancepilot.com